TIP TALKS

 

The Newsletter of the Toxics Information Project (TIP)

 

WINTER 2005

 

 

******************************************************************************

 

WORKING TOWARDS LESS TOXIC LIVING

WHAT DOES TIP DIRECTOR LIBERTY GOODWIN ACTUALLY DO?

 

NEW:  Lawn Pesticide Bills  Having gotten two bills introduced and awaiting a hearing before the RI State Senate Environment & Agriculture Committee on March 16, 2005, Liberty is planning her own testimony, while seeking and coordinating support and input from others for the legislation.

 

NEW:  RI State Science Fair:  Through a contact made at the RI Flower & Garden Show in February, Liberty G will be a judge at this event that involves all the high schools in Rhode Island.  She will offer several awards on behalf of TIP, to projects that tend to further our mission of Lighting the Way to Less Toxic Living.

 

NEW:  Asthma Conference.  Plans are under way in the RI Asthma Coalition to offer a conference in October about the environmental connections to asthma.  Liberty G is very involved in seeking speakers for this event – ones that will highlight the chemical triggers that are often less spoken about.  She also continues as a member of the School Advocacy Committee.

 

NEW:  Special Joint Commission to Study A Statewide Coordination of Environmental Health & Safety Issues, Information & Resources for Rhode Island Schools:  Yet another networking opportunity for Liberty G!  Created last session by the RI General Assembly, this 24-member group includes representation from practically everyone involved with schools, children’s health, etc. in the state.  Liberty has been appointed to represent State Senator Rhoda Perry on the commission.

 

NEW:  Miriam Hospital Environment Committee.  Guess who’s on this just-formed committee, which will help name an Environmental Consultant for this institution as it engages in major expansion and renovation?

 

NEW:  Litter Control Task Force, RI Environment Roundtable.  Liberty will be encouraging attention

 to hazardous waste and substances involving petroleum and pollution in manufacture, such as plastics.

 

2005 RI Sustainable Living Festival:  Liberty is again on the SLF 2005 Planning Committee, and TIP expects to have a booth and two speakers at this June event, held at the Apeiron Institute for Environmental Living in Coventry.

 

In Her “Spare” Time:  Liberty will be organizing the “Pesticide-Free Playing Fields” Initiative and its “CALL TO ACTION”; planning and compiling the new “Less Toxic Landscaping” Resource Guide; running the TIP booth at a variety of environment, health and school fairs, as well as informational tables at sites such as Eastside Marketplace & the RI Children’s Museum; writing and editing more “TIP TALKS” newsletters; writing grant proposals; talking to the Better Breathers group (and any other that will listen); responding to E-Mail queries and doing other research; attending conferences and meetings of related organizations in other states…


MARCH - WINDS OF CHANGE BLOWING? -

 

In our last newsletter we looked back at the year just past.  This month, more than usually, I am noticing many harbingers of change, and am truly excited by that.  I’d like to talk just a bit about what’s happening, or trying to happen, as wintry winds persist and Spring lurks round the corner.

 

LEGISLATIVE MOVES:  Our own legislative initiatives were inspired – and copied – from the ones being offered in Connecticut.  A similar push to restrict the use of toxic lawn pesticides for cosmetic use is happening in other parts of the U.S., and very actively in Canada.  There is also a bill at the federal level on school pesticide use – but it’s our feeling that the local measures are most likely to pass.  The chemical industry recognizes the vigor of this movement, and is fighting back hard, with advertising and lobbying.  Major components of the struggle are preemptive clauses slipped through most state legislatures in the last ten or so years, prohibiting towns and cities from passing their own pesticide control ordinances.  That’s why one of our bills would remove that prohibition.  The other would put a ban on use of lawn pesticides on the grounds of schools and day care facilities. 

 

CHEMLAWN UNDER PRESSURE:  The Toxics Action Center, with offices in Massachusetts & Connecticut, is launching a campaign on March 15 called, “Be Truly Green – Refuse to Use ChemLawn!”  The group is demanding that ChemLawn phase out the use of pesticides and immediately stop use of those considered possible or likely carcinogens; disclose all ingredients in their pesticide products, including so-called “inerts”, offer a comprehensive organic lawn-care program with accredited applicators; and stop using children to sell their products, as they have done in their partnership with U.S. Youth Soccer.  People are being asked to avoid ChemLawn until these demands are met.

 

PLAYING FIELDS VICTORY:  Happily, just this week word came that, under pressure from organizations and parents, the Youth Soccer Association has already decided to end its contractual relationship with ChemLawn – a great victory for less toxic playing fields!!

 

NURSE EDUCATION ON TOXICS MOVES FORWARD:  Addressing another TIP concern, our wonderful Board member and Treasurer Chris Pontus, M.S., COHN-S, CCM, has created an online course for nurses on protecting their charges with fragile immune systems from toxic fragranced products.  It will be available soon and will provide professional credit to nurses that take the training.  Congratulations, Chris, for a great project!

 

ANOTHER ENCOURAGING NURSE KNOWLEDGE REPORT:  A survey conducted in New York State about two years ago found that 71 percent of 206 school nurses from across the state knew of students and staff whose learning, health and/or behavior were affected by indoor pollutants such as pesticides, disinfectants and cleaning products.  Health professionals are starting to notice!

 

FAMOUS LAST WORDS? :  “Preemptive Legislation is Effective” -  Victor Crawford, a former lobbyist for the Tobacco Institute, summarized the tobacco industry's rationale for seeking preemption legislation: "We could never win at the local level . . . so the Tobacco Institute and tobacco companies' first priority has always been to preempt the field, preferably to put it all on the federal level, but if they can't do that, at least on the state level, because the health advocates can't compete with me on a state level" (from an interview with Victor Crawford appearing in the July 19, 1995 of JAMA -- Journal of the American.  (IT WORKED FOR A WHILE – BUT SMOKING BANS ARE SWEEPING ACROSS AMERICA NOW!  LET’S SEEK SIMILAR OUTCOMES RE: LAWN PESTICIDES!). 

 

Liberty Goodwin, Director, Toxics Information Project (TIP)

 

 

HELP US PROTECT CHILDREN & THE WATER TABLE

 

 

1.                    MAKE ONE OR MORE CALLS TO GET US INFO ABOUT LAWN PESTICIDE USE ON YOUR TOWN’S PLAYING FIELDS.

2.                    PASS ALONG OUR “CALL TO ACTION” & REPORTING FORM TO OTHERS.

3.                    SUBMIT ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF OUR TWO LAWN PESTICIDE BILLS BEFORE THE RI STATE SENATE.

 ENCOURAGE A LOCAL CHURCH, PTA OR GARDEN CLUB TO HOST A TALK ON ORGANIC GARDENING OR ON OUR LAWN PESTICIDE CONCERNS. (WE PROVIDE THE SPEAKER).

 

CONTACT LIBERTY GOODWIN, TIP DIRECTOR, FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO OFFER TO HELP.  TEL. 401-351-9193, OR E-MAIL:  LIBERTY@TOXICSINFO.ORG 

 

CANARY CORNER

 

 

 

Every baby is a “canary” – and one of the most vulnerable to harm from chemical toxins.  They depend on us to keep them safe.  Here’s some help.

 

 

NEW RESOURCE FOR "CANARIES" AND PARENTS!

 

Lynn Tondat Ruggeri, Ph.D. (a former TIP Advisory Committee member) & Laura Costa, Ph.D. have written a new informational booklet entitled "SAFER FOR YOUR BABY: A Guide to Living Better with Fewer Chemicals," which is now available for online and retail purchase.  The booklet is designed for new and expecting parents, but is useful for anyone who wants to live a healthier life.  The guide shows you simple ways to protect your family from harmful chemicals commonly found in personal care, cleaning and pest control products, toys, food, clothing, home furnishings and decor.

 

THIS BOOKLET WILL HELP YOU:

 

- Choose safer foods, toys, bottles and personal care items

- Understand why babies are more vulnerable to harmful chemicals

- Identify items to avoid when decorating the nursery and doing household projects

- Find safer substitutes for the most toxic products in your home

- Stay up-to-date on these topics by providing resources and reference including sites with web search options

- Find safe and inexpensive recipes for household cleaning, simple ways to improve air quality, and important information on household products that most seriously impact on children's health ...and much more.

 

The 67-page booklet is soft-covered, printed on recycled paper with soy ink and can be ordered online for $5.95 plus shipping and handling at: http://saferforyourbaby.com/_wsn/page4.html  It is also available at Books on the Square, Providence; Back to Basics, E. Greenwich; Food for Thought, Narragansett; Alternative Food Co-op, Wakefield; Baker Books, N. Dartmouth MA; and Down to Earth Natural Foods, New Bedford, MA.

*************************************************************************************************************

CLEANING PRODUCTS MAY AFFECT BABIES’ BREATHING

January 11, 2005, By Alison McCook

 

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Pregnant women who use a lot of household chemical products are more likely to have babies with persistent wheezing, new research reports.  The products included bleach, disinfectant, air fresheners, aerosols, carpet cleaners and pesticides.  Children with wheezing are more at risk of eventually developing asthma, explained study author Dr. Andrea Sherriff at the University of Bristol in the UK.  Moreover, "persistent wheezing stops the child from living a normal life -- exercising, going to school," she told Reuters Health. This "may make them susceptible to other conditions, such as obesity."  Although the study did not measure how much exposure to household chemicals is safe for pregnant women, Sherriff recommended that they should "be sensible" with chemicals, and follow the product's instructions, particularly with regards to ventilation.  Previous research has found that people who are heavily exposed to household products are more likely to develop symptoms of asthma.  Of all professions, cleaners have one of the highest risks of developing the disease.

 

To see if prenatal exposure to these chemicals also increases the risk of breathing problems, Sherriff and her team asked the mothers of 7019 children about the chemicals they were exposed to while pregnant, and how often their children wheezed from birth to age 42 months. The women completed surveys while pregnant, and periodically after the child was born. Slightly more than 6 percent of the children showed signs of persistent wheezing.  The children whose mothers used the most chemicals were more than twice as likely to persistently wheeze than those whose mothers used the least chemicals, the authors report in the journal Thorax.

 

Sherriff explained that experts suspect that chemicals may affect infants' breathing by irritating their airways and lungs.  She added that mothers who use a lot of chemicals during pregnancy will likely do the same thing once the babies are born, so it's difficult to say whether a baby's wheezing comes from exposures before or after birth.  Alternatively, she suggested that infants who are in an overly clean environment may not be exposed to the bacteria and germs that help us build healthy immune systems.  "If we have immune systems which don't work well, then we are more likely to become allergic to things in our environment, and possibly wheeze as a result," Sherriff said.

******************************************************************************************

**********************************************************************************

PESTICIDES

 

Why & How to Avoid Them in Lawn Care & Food

*************************************************************************************

 

CHEMICAL PESTICIDES - HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH

http://www.chem-tox.com/pesticides/

 

Pesticide Inhalation Associated with Brain and Lung Cancer SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 71(1), July 1983  A study of 3,827 Florida pesticide applicators employed for 20 or more years found they had nearly 3 times the risk for developing lung cancer. The same study also showed the pesticide applicators had twice the risk for brain cancer. There was not any increased cancer risk when applicators were studied for only 5 years implying it takes over 5 years to accumulate enough damage to the genetic structure to develop the cancers. 

 

Brain Damage Linked to Lawn Pesticides  (Sources: 3 references listed below)

The pesticide MCPA, used as an ingredient is some lawn pesticides, has been found to damage a part of the brain known as the blood brain barrier (1).  The blood brain barrier is the brain's primary defense system, which works to keep toxic substances out of the brain cells and is literally protecting all of us from developing immediate neurological illness. The blood brain barrier has been found to be defective more often in patients with Alzheimers and some psychiatric disorders (2).  In fact, the lack of functioning of the blood brain barrier in the human infant has been reported on many occasions as being the reason why an infant is being found to develop brain damage after exposure to common chemicals while an adult with a mature blood brain barrier does not. Unfortunately, EPA neurotoxicologist Dr. Bill Sette stated EPA does not yet require chemical companies to test any of their pesticides for causing blood brain barrier damage.  Another study of 56 men exposed to organophosphate pesticides detected memory problems and difficulty in maintaining alertness and focusing attention (3).  Also see:  www.chem-tox.com/bbb for more on the blood brain barrier.

 

1. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 65:23, 1982  ; 

2. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141:273, 1982 
3. Annual Reviews in Public Health, 7:461, 1986 

 

Common Lawn Pesticide Linked to Cancer  (Sources below)

The lawn pesticides, mancozeb and chlorothalonil (used by commercial lawn spray companies as fungicides), have been classified by EPA as "probable" cancer causing chemicals in humans as they have been found to cause cancer in animals (1). Mancozeb has also been found to react with sunlight to form a new compound EPA categorizes as a "known" human carcinogen (1). The common lawn pesticide 2,4-D has been shown to increase the risk of lymphatic cancer in farmers six times the normal rate according to a National Cancer Institute report (2). 

 

  1. Newsweek, May 16, pg.77, 1988; 
  2. 2.  Science News, September 13, 1986

********************************************************************************************************************

 

ORGANIC CONSUMERS DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THIS
 
After compiling over 100,000 laboratory tests, the Environmental Working Group has released a list of conventionally grown produce that is the most and the least contaminated by pesticides.  Among the worst were apples, peppers, celery and cherries. Among the best were asparagus, avocados, bananas, broccoli, cauliflower, corn, kiwi, mangoes, onions, papayas, pineapples and sweet peas.  Of course, the safest course of action is to buy organic fruits and vegetables.  Download the full list here: http://www.foodnews.org/reportcard.php
 

ONE MORE RESOURCE FOR HEALTHIER LANDSCAPING & LIVING!

 

Earth Friendly Alternatives  (to herbicides, pesticides & household chemicals) - A Concise Guide.

Topics include Pesticides Impact on Human Health, Improving the Soil, Garden Pest Management, Animal Pests, Weed Control, Lawn Care, Watering, Plant Cures for Toxic Soil, Household Cleaning.

Published by the Stonington Garden Club in Connecticut.  62 pages, 100% recycled paper, $6. 

Soon to be available from TIP, to support our work.


 

20 Ways to Reduce Your Intake of Chemicals in Body Care Products http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/reduce052104.cfm

Saturday May 8, 2004, The Guardian (UK)

 

1. Clear out your bathroom cabinet and dump everything but the essentials.  Try not to duplicate - if you currently use three moisturisers, get rid of two.

2. Avoid baby wipes, which can contain parabens and propylene glycol – a common ingredient in anti-freeze.  A damp flannel (cloth) will do the job just as well.

3. Overwashing with chemically-based shampoos and conditioners strips the hair of its natural oils.  If you usually shampoo daily, leave for a day or two and see if it makes any difference. (Or try plain old Dr. Bronner’s liquid soap or all-natural shampoos)

4. If you're worried about sunscreen, cover up or keep out of the sun completely. Currently only 30 percent of us stay in the shade, according to Cancer Research UK.

5. Avoid unnecessary use of products with a high sun protection factor – at night you don 't need to use a moisturiser with an SPF.

6. Cut down on bubble baths, which can contain skin-irritating detergents. All your baby needs to keep clean is a tub full of warm water.

7 Splash your face with witch hazel or cold water instead of using over-the-counter toners.

8 Become label savvy. Everyone reads food labels - get in the habit of doing the same with your toiletries.  They won 't tell you everything, but it will help. 

9. If you want to be sure a product is organic, look out for a Soil Association certification. (only applies to U.K.)  Words like organic, natural and hypoallergenic generally mean little in the beauty industry.

10 When using a product, follow the instructions. It's easy to use far more than you need to.

11 Switch to organic tampons and sanitary towels. They're non-chlorine bleached, 100% pure cotton and GM-free. Try Natracare Regular Organic Cotton Tampons. (Available at Whole Foods Market and independent health stores.)

12 Rediscover henna which is natural and less invasive than heavy-duty hair dyes.

13 If you're going swimming, ozone pools have fewer chemicals.  But when visiting chlorine pools, make sure you (and your children) shower first.  If everyone washed before getting in, there'd be less need for so many chemicals in the water.

14 If you can't give up nail varnish, protect the cuticles with oil.  Although the part of the nail you see is dead, it is still porous and can absorb the chemicals used in varnish and remover, such as toluene, acetone and formaldehyde.

15 A thick coating of aloe vera gel is a good alternative to shaving foams and gels.  It has natural anti-inflammatory and skin-softening properties, without all the chemicals.

16 The average make-up wearing woman will eat two pounds of lipstick in her life-time.  Most lipsticks contain petroleum derivatives.  Try brands based on beeswax, plant oils or vitamin E instead.

17 If you 're worried about deodorants, there are more natural products on the market.  Be prepared to try a few before you find one that suits – but beware, seemingly green products can have hidden ingredients such as parabens.

18 Do a website trawl.  Greenpeace (greenpeace.org.uk) and Women's Environmental Network (wen.org.uk) both have useful lists of products to avoid, as well as companies with good track records.

19 Arm yourself with knowledge.  Get hold of a copy of Kim Erickson's Drop-Dead Gorgeous (published by Contemporary Books), to find out more about what's in your cosmetics.

20 Ask your granny for tips.  Lemon juice, for example, has always been used as a beauty aid - to make fair hair shine, to soften hard skin, and get rid of blackheads.  Cosmetics haven't always been all about products devised in laboratories.

 

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004


CLEANING PRODUCTS AND YOUR HEALTH

 

Many of us tend to look for the strongest-smelling products to clean our homes. But some of these cleaning products can harm our health even if used as directed. They contain toxic chemicals, which could harm or even kill you if you swallow or inhale them or absorb them through your skin.

 


COMMON TOXICS IN CLEANING PRODUCTS:


 

AMMONIA

(bathroom cleaners)

 

BLEACH

(laundry products, kitchen and

bathroom cleaners)

 

 

POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE (LYE)

(oven cleaner)

 

PETROLEUM DISTILLATES

(furniture, silverware and jewelry polish)


LESS TOXIC ALTERNATIVES.


 

BAKING SODA: Absorbs odors, cleans like a scouring powder. Just sprinkle around the area that needs to be cleaned and add water.

 

WHITE VINEGAR AND LEMON: Cleans windows, countertops, chrome, floors etc; cuts grease. Lemons also deodorize.

 

SALT: Gets stuck-on food off pots/pans. Just sprinkle salt and

add cool water and let it sit a while.

 

BORAX: Great for deodorizing laundry


 


SPIN/TESH is a collaborative project of the Regional Environmental Council (REC),UMassMemorial Health Care, and The Toxics Use Reduction Institute (TURI) Contact:  Rosa Fernandez-Peńaloza (508) 334-7641

 

Soap Chemical Said Found in Md. Streams

 

Thu Aug 19, 7:58 AM ET, AP/Yahoo News  BALTIMORE - An anti-bacterial agent commonly found in soaps and detergents has been found in water from streams and wastewater treatment plants in the Baltimore area, a Johns Hopkins researcher said Wednesday.  The chemical, triclocarban, was not found in well water or municipal drinking water, but was found in samples from six streams as well as wastewater treatment plants in the Baltimore area.  "We put out almost a million pounds of this every year, and nobody ever bothered to take a look what happens to the stuff once we are done with it," said study author Rolf U. Halden, assistant professor of the School's Department of Environmental Health Sciences and founding member of its Center for Water and Health.  "We pick up a bar of soap, the material gets washed down, goes to the wastewater treatment plant, and a lot of it ends up in our surface water."

 

Triclocarban is not one of the chemicals whose presence in drinking water is monitored or regulated by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (news - web sites), but it is being reviewed by the EPA, Halden said.

The chemical was found in surface water at levels up to 20 times higher than those reported to the EPA by the chemical industry, said Halden, who added that his group now plans a wider study of the chemical in surface waters nationwide. Results of the study have been published in the online edition of Environmental Science & Technology.  The researcher said his group had to develop a new test to detect the chemical because conventional monitoring techniques cannot detect it.  "Now the big question is what are the ecological and human health consequences of triclocarban in the environment? From the chemical structure, one would expect the compound to concentrate in fish and bio-accumulate in the food chain, but at this point we can only speculate," Halden said.

 

A Web site posted by Frederick Senese, an associate professor of chemistry at Frostburg State University who was not involved in the study, says triclocarban kills bacteria by blocking an enzyme that many bacteria and funguses need for survival.  The highly specific way that triclosan kills also has researchers concerned about its role in fostering antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria, the Web site says.  Halden said the researchers tested water entering and leaving the city's three water treatment plants as well as samples from the Jones Falls, Gwynn's Falls, Gwynn's Run, Maiden's Choice Run, Western Run and Stony Run.  Halden said it is "somewhat unsettling that we've been using this persistent disinfectant for almost half a century at rates approaching 1 million pounds per year and still have essentially no idea of what exactly happens to the compound after we flush it down the drain."


AVOIDING CHEMICAL CAUSES OF CANCER

 

 

TWO LARGELY UNRECOGNIZED RISK FACTORS – CHLORINE & PLASTICS

 

Chlorinated Water.  When chlorine is used to disinfect drinking water, sewage and swimming pools, it combines with the organic matter in the water and produces hundreds of by-products, including the carcinogenic organochlorines called trihalomethanes.  At high temperatures, such as in showers, hot tubs, dishwashers, washing machines, and swimming pools, these evaporate out of the water and we inhale them. 

The non-profit agency Greenpeace has a toxics campaign which calls for a global phase-out of the production of organochlorines.  There are safe ways to treat water, such as using ultra-violet light or ozone.  Los Angeles used to have one of the highest rates of throat cancer in the nation.  After a five-year study, city leaders chose ozone for the water purification system.  Israel has a national ban on organo-chlorines. Breast cancer rates there have dramatically decreased since the ban was instituted.  Israel is now the only western country which does not have a rapidly rising rate of breast cancer.  (Get a shower filter, buy your drinking water, and use ozone in the hot tub.)  Many people are also concerned about the dangers of fluoride being routinely added to drinking water.

 

Plastics. There are definitely links between the pervasive use of plastics in our society and some kinds of cancer, notably cancers of the reproductive organs.  Many plastics have estrogenic properties, meaning they mimic estrogen in the body.  This is unhealthy for both women and men. (There has been a steady decline in the amount of sperm produced by men in industrial countries.)  The findings surprised a lot of people, for the unhealthy plastics included such things as Bakelite bakeware, which was certified as safe for food many years ago.  Problems have been found with plastics used in an enormous variety of products.  Fourteen European countries have banned alkylphenol polyethoxylates, which are still widely used in the U.S.  The European Union has called for an emergency ban on phthalates, which leach from vinyl toys and teething rings into children’s mouths.  Here is a partial list of items in which cancer-causing plastics have been found: liquid clothes detergents, household cleaning products, plasticizers and UV stabilizers, shampoo, the linings of metal food cans and bottle tops and water supply lines, cling food wrap, styrene containers and utensils, dental composites (plastic fillings), U.S.-made tampons (most European brands are fine), cosmetics, skin creams, hair spray, nail polish, perfume, vinyl flooring, feeding bottle nipples, the blue plastic jugs used to transport water, PVC food containers, cell phones, shoes, notebook covers, tool handles, garden hoses, rainwear, plastic car interiors, credit cards, flea collars, and in the adhesives which hold together some kinds of paper and cardboard food containers.  Some plastics contaminate ground water when the items are thrown away.

 

“Studies in 2000 reveal phthalates present in the blood of adult Americans ‘at levels we are concerned about’ and ‘higher than we anticipated,’ according to the Centers for Disease Control.”

“In Europe, dozens of communities, hospitals, and manufacturers of furniture, cars, flooring, and appliances have virtually eliminated PVC from their products and construction projects.”

 

Over 100,000 synthetic chemicals are in use today, with 1,000 more being introduced each year.  Only about 1,000 have been studied in any detail, and only 10-20 are studied each year.  No one has systematically screened for hormone effects. It is unlikely that all plastics are hazardous, but because of manufacturers’ claims of trade secrets, there is no way to know the chemical composition of any given plastic; even the Freedom of Information Act contains an exemption for trade secrets or “confidential business information.”

 

*************************************************************************************************************

PLASTICS & BOTTLED WATER

Keep in mind that since water containers are not regulated, many of the so-called pure bottled waters come in less than satisfactory plastic bottles.  Look for the RO label on the bottle and use clear, (not dyed) plastic containers only.  Soda pop does come in food grade containers because they must.  Why?  Because the acidic nature of cola will eat holes in any other.  If we eat food or drink water that has been stored in non food-grade plastic, we are likely to be consuming the toxics that leach from the container into what you are eating or drinking, especially when heated in them.  http://nudaways.com/water.html

 

MORE REASON FOR CAUTION – DECEPTION!

Cancer, Chemicals and History.  Twenty of the biggest chemical companies in the United States have launched a campaign to discredit two historians who have studied the industry's efforts to conceal links between their products and cancer. The Nation  http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050207&s=wiener

 

 

PLASTICS WITHOUT PETROLEUM? – (A BUNCH OF MANURE!)

 

Researchers at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland and Washington State University are developing a technique to isolate and extract the valuable components in manure and turn them into materials for plastics and anti-freeze, cosmetics, even deodorants!  This research could make manure a commodity that farmers could sell and help plastic manufactures reduce their reliance on petroleum-based materials.  Glycols, diols, and other chemicals used in many plastic products and cosmetics are usually processed from petroleum. Rather than drawing a resource from underground, the researchers hope to scoop up another, cheaper material from farm stalls.  They say the abundance of carbohydrates in animal manure could provide the building blocks for chemical production.  

 

Don Stevens, the project manager at PNNL, says his research is based on PNNL's patented technology used to convert by-products of corn, wheat and dairy processing. The research is still in its preliminary phase, but in small scale tests at the PNNL lab, Stevens and his collogues have been able to convert carbohydrates extracted from the manure into valuable compounds used in manufacturing plastics and antifreeze.  Stevens thinks this technology could be widely available to farmers within a few years. And if this technology takes off, an added environmental benefit is that the plastics industries would be able to reduce their reliance on the petroleum-based materials they currently use to manufacture their products.

 

CONTACTS:  Don Stevens: Project Manager, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, (509) 372-4603

Joe Harrison: Professor, Washington State University, (253) 445-4638
For more on this, see:http://www.acfnewsource.org/environment/manure_to_market.html

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/07/0717_wiremanure.html

http://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/2001/0619/Story2.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TIP TALKS Winter Issue 2005

 

 

MEMBERSHIPS/DONATIONS

 
WELCOME!  Wendy Bradshaw, Anna Browder, Melanie Brown, Maggie Crane, Dana Houghton, Paul E. McElroy, Astrid Murre, Sally E. Smoot
 
RENEWALS/FAITHFUL SUPPORT:
Kate Lacouture, Christine Pontus, Aimee Reisman, Susan R. Warren
 

 

THANK YOU:  E/The Environment Magazine for their premium subscription support program.

 

 

 

TOXICS INFORMATION PROJECT (TIP)

P.O. Box 40572, Providence, RI 02940

Telephone (401) 351-9193

E-Mail:  TIPTALKS@toxicinfo.org

Web:  www.toxicsinfo.org