TIP TALKS

 

The Newsletter of the Toxics Information Project (TIP)

 

        SUMMER 2005

******************************************************************************

 

ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES MOVE FRONT AND CENTER

 

An E-Mail from the RI Governor’s Commission on Disabilities has led to tremendous momentum for our accessibility concerns agenda.  We co-sponsored a Special Forum on the Concerns of People Affected by Household Chemicals on August 23, 2005, in cooperation with the American Lung Association RI (ALARI), and held in their large conference room.  The response was amazing!  At least 20 people turned up, and most testified, before a panel that included Barbara Morin-(DEM), Michael Spoerri-(Dept of Health), Elaina Goldstein-(Rhodes to Independence), Susan Shapiro-(Office of Rehabilitation Services), Stephen Brunero-(Dept Human Services/ORS), Curtiss James-(Commission of Deaf and Hard of Hearing), Brian Adae-(Disability Law Center).   We wound up having to limit speaking to four minutes each,  in order to finish within the two hours allotted for the event.

 

Panelist Elaina Goldstein committed herself on the spot to work in 2006 on several of the issues described, in cooperation with TIP, the Governor’s Commission and others.  About a dozen people have already indicated their interest in helping us in this follow-up effort.  We expect to offer opportunities for participation in your choice of several groups - focusing on health care facilities, schools, workplaces and housing.  We will be seeking to free these from chemical pollutants responsible for deleterious health effects.  If you have not signed up and would like to participate, please contact me and let me know on which area you would like to work with us.  We will be providing educational materials and talks, meeting with decision makers and employers, possibly proposing regulations or legislation.  With our new allies, we are very hopeful that much can be accomplished in the coming year!  See page two and three of this newsletter for excerpts from some of the testimony at the forum, and go to http://www.toxicsinfo.org/canary/GCDForum8-23-05.htm  for more.

 

***********************************************************************************************************

CONTINUING AND NEW TIP ACTIVITIES

 

Less Toxic Landscaping Resource Guide.  Up next on the agenda for TIP Director Liberty Goodwin.  The goal will be to collect contacts for how-to information, supplies and services in one handy booklet. 

 

Lawn Pesticide Bills.  We finally got a hearing on April 6, 2005 before the RI House Environment & Natural Resources Committee, but no action was taken during the 2005 legislative session.  We will be re-submitting both bills for 2006, and expect to meet with agency people and others beforehand to seek ways to improve the wording and develop more support.  NEW:  Connecticut passed one similar bill into law – banning the use of lawn pesticides on the grounds of elementary schools and day care centers.  Integrated Pest Management (IPM) will be permitted as a transitional practice for three years on playing fields – after that the ban will apply to them as well.

 

RI State Science Fair:  It’s not too early to think of working on school projects that illustrate the need for and viability of less toxic living.  We offer assistance to students wishing to do research or create projects that are TIP concerns-related, whether for the next Science Fair or just for school. 

 

Other Activities:  This Fall, we are hoping to offer alternative, less-toxic gifts, including healthy indoor plants, for sale at holiday fairs and bazaars, to raise money for TIP.  We have already been invited to do this at the October 16 Fall Festival on Hope Street in Providence.  Please contact us if you know of other possible events, or sources of sale items.

****************************************************************************************************************************



CANARY CORNER

 

 

A CANARY BILL OF RIGHTS

 

 

Excerpted from August 23 Special Forum Testimony of Paul Klinkman

 

I believe that certain chemicals continue to turn formerly healthy people into canaries for life.  Statistical evidence links the prevalence of these chemicals to an erosion of the human immune system’s capabilities.  Often these same cholinesterase inhibitor chemicals are also linked to asthma, to cancer and to multiple sclerosis.  I believe that no one, healthy, asthmatic or canary, should be forced to breathe any unhealthy chemicals.  The school of hard knocks has trained human canaries and asthmatics to sense unhealthy indoor air.  If we value our kids, we will not let children (or adults) breathe any air that a human canary can’t breathe. 

I believe that chemically sensitive people should have civil rights.

 

Ø      A canary should have the right to go to a hospital without having medical consequences from cleaning chemicals in the hospital’s air, or by heavy perfume worn by a nurse.  Safer cleaning chemicals exist.  Previous generations of nurses all knew better than to wear perfume around asthmatic patients.  This generation of nurses needs to be taught not to do so.

 

Ø      A canary should have the right to go to a church, synagogue, mosque, temple or meetinghouse, the right to worship God, the right to belong to a community of worshippers, without the chemical solvents in the next worshipper’s perfume, cologne or body scent putting her flat on her back for a week. 

 

Ø      A canary should have the right to use a public airline without getting poisoned on the plane or sick in the terminal.  People who were allergic to cigarette smoke once had no rights on an airplane, but then the government made smokers move to the back of the plane.  Later, smoking was banned on airliners.  The privileges of fumers should now be weighed against the medical needs of asthmatics and canaries.

 

Ø      A canary should have the right not to be physically assaulted, nor to have a credible threat of assault.  An angry man once threatened to spray my wife Liberty Goodwin in the face with his finger on the nozzle of a can of air freshener.  He backed her out of a door with what essentially was a dangerous weapon pointed at her.  It’s possible that this man didn’t believe his weapon would actually do medical damage, but he at least knew that my wife was as afraid of the wielded weapon as she would be of, say, a knife.

 

Ø      A canary should have the right not to be poisoned out of a job by a co-worker or co-workers, in cases where a department budget is shrinking and the co-workers stand to gain financially by hanging on to their own jobs.

 

Ø      An asthmatic or a canary should have the right to enter a polling place to vote without adverse medical consequences.  An asthmatic or a canary should be able to attend any government hearing.

 

Ø      Schools should not make readily available to students any cholinesterase inhibitor chemical commonly used by kids for “huffing”.  To do so would facilitate drug abuse.  Neither should these same chemicals be in school air in trace amounts, as evidence exists that neurotoxic chemicals demonstrably affect the education of kids with ADHD, and might be subclinically affecting other students also.

 

Canaries should have many civil rights.  We only mention the most basic human rights here, which canaries don’t yet have.  Canaries and asthmatics have one enforced civil right.  The United States Postal Service will no longer let fragranced advertisements and fragranced magazines be bulk-mailed to homes.  In homes that use mail slots, fragranced ads would automatically pollute the air of asthmatics and canaries in their own homes. The enforcement of civil rights for canaries may in fact save the lives and health of other people, people who by rights should live a long life. 

 

Perhaps each healthy person’s civil right to a healthy life is being violated too.  Asthma, allergies and chemical sensitivity are statistically linked.  We live in a pandemic of histamine reactions and cholinesterase inhibitor reactions.  Asthma, allergies and chemical sensitivity are normal to the human condition, but never were they normal in the quantities seen in this modern generation.  The modern discrepancy might be caused by toxic chemicals in what we breathe, in what we eat, on our skin, in what we buy and bring home, as well as by diet and exercise.  Furthermore, we seem to be doing worse every decade.  Americans are getting cancer in greater numbers than ever before.  Perhaps we are killing ourselves by our own purchases.


WHAT TO DO?

 

From August 23 Special Forum Testimony by Liberty Goodwin, TIP Director

 

The really important thing is, what actions can reasonably and realistically be taken to improve the situation of this vulnerable group of people?  I have a few suggestions.

 

  1. PROTOCOLS & POLICIES in all involuntary public facilities – those which people must have access, and cannot just avoid.  This would include health care providers, nursing homes, schools.  All should require fragrance-free employees, alternative, less toxic cleaning products, low or no-VOC paints, rugs, etc.  Public bathrooms should be free of toxic “deodorizers” or “air fresheners” (actually pollutants per the EPA).  These kinds of requirements are being used and enforced in many hospitals and other places, in both the U.S. and Canada.  Policies could be instituted voluntarily or, better, be statewide by regulation or legislation.  In schools, toxin-free environments would benefit not only those with conditions like ADD and asthma -  studies indicate they might reduce aggressive behavior in some and enhance the learning abilities of other students as well.

 

  1. EDUCATION.  The Commission can provide information to employers, medical people, school personnel, on the health effects of chemicals and on the alternatives available.This could involve developing a database of such effective measures, healthier products and accommodations that work, as well as a possible speakers’ bureau.

 

  1. LAWN PESTICIDE LEGISLATION.   Support the two bills to protect Rhode Islanders from toxic lawn pesticides, introduced in 2005 and coming back next year.  One would ban the use of such products at schools and day care centers.  (A similar bill was passed this year in Connecticut).  The other would permit towns and cities to pass ordinances restricting cosmetic lawn pesticide use within their borders that were more stringent than those at the state level.  They had this power until it was taken away from them in 1990.  This might allow, among other things, some kind of response to the growing number of people who are sickened in their homes – or driven out of them -  by  pesticide drift from neighbors’ lawn applications.

 

  1. ENCOURAGING FEDERAL ACTION ON TRANSPORTATION.  Although the Commission does not have power to change regulations for airlines, perhaps the Governor, in cooperation with counterparts in other states, could call upon federal authorities to address “canary” accessibility issues on planes.  A simple provision requiring fragrance-free flight attendants and the right to request that someone change seats with you would be a Godsend to the chemically sensitive, asthmatics and those with other respiratory or health conditions.

 

***************************************************************************************************************

TWO TALES OF CHEMICALS IN THE CLASSROOM

 

QUERY:  Maybe if school and workplace administrators realized how fragrance, cleaning and other chemicals can affect brain functionality and productivity, they would be more willing to clean up their air?

 

“Let me introduce you to Tracey, a bright, seven-year-old, environmentally hypersensitive child in Australia who had to contend with asthma, tachycardia, multiple food and chemical sensitivities, hyperactivity and learning difficulties. Tracey was labeled a non-reader at her school until her mother requested perfume and solvent accommodations. Two weeks after her classroom teacher stopped wearing perfume and banned solvent-based marking pens, Tracey began to read fluently!!”  (Excerpted from “Open Letter: Perfumes Contaminate Our Classrooms”, posted in full at:  http://www.toxicsinfo.org/canary/Protocols/PerfumeInClassrooms.htm

 

Report from a Rhode Island mother:  (Hearing testimony will be posted when received.) She and her son were sensitized by toxic exposure from nearby waste dump.  She has headaches, lightheadedness, mood changes from exposures, including perfume, also hives from laundry detergent.  Her son was diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD).  Symptoms, including inability to concentrate, headaches, etc., abated at school when teachers stopped using perfume and switched to chalk instead of permanent markers. Within 2 weeks of no chemical exposure in class, he went from 3 or 4 right answers on tests to 100 % marks.


SIGNS OF PROGRESS

 

GREEN SUCCESS

5

Presidential awards honor chemists for developing cleaner and economically viable technologies

 

 STEPHEN K. RITTER, C&EN WASHINGTON, June 27, 2005, Volume 83, Number 26, pp. 40-43      

                                                                                       

"We have changed innumerable things in the practice of chemistry, but the most important thing we have changed is our minds," commented American Chemical Society President William F. Carroll, speaking last week at a ceremony honoring the winners of the 2005 Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards. A few moments earlier, Carroll had recounted a story about how, during a recent discussion in China, one student's pronouncement that "pollution is inevitable with growth and progress" had stopped him cold.

 

"From the perspective of the chemical industry, pollution and progress are not synonymous," Carroll recalled telling the student. "Pollution is waste, and waste means cost." Carroll followed up by telling the student that the job of chemists is not to find a singular solution to a technical problem, but to challenge themselves to constantly find better solutions. "That understanding is fundamental to what we call green chemistry," Carroll said. Green chemistry is all about more efficient production of industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and consumer products. That is to say, the purpose of green chemistry is to find ways to develop ever-better chemical products and processes that require fewer reagents, less solvent, and less energy to produce, while being safer, generating less waste, and increasing profitability.  One Massachusetts company won an award:  

 

Metabolix, Cambridge, Mass., was selected as the award winner in the small business category for developing a fermentation process to produce polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) "natural plastics" from renewable feedstocks such as plant sugars or oils. These readily biodegradable polyester polymers and copolymers combine the film-barrier properties of polyesters with the mechanical performance properties of petroleum-based polyethylene and polypropylene. Metabolix is set to start making PHAs on a large scale. It will join Cargill and DuPont--former Green Chemistry Award-winning producers of NatureWorks and Sorona, respectively--as producers of biobased polymers.

 

For full story: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/83/8326sci1.html 

 

**************************************************************************************************************************

 

NEW YORK STATE REQUIRES SCHOOLS TO USE GREEN CLEANING

(Beyond Pesticides, August 25, 2005)


A recent vote by the New York State Senate now requires schools to use green cleaning products. The bill, Senate Bill 5435 (S5435), signed into law on August 23, 2005, by New York Governor George Pataki, requires the procurement and use of environmentally sensitive cleaning and maintenance products in schools.  In a press release from Healthy Schools Network, Claire Barnett, Executive Director said, "We are committed to working with the Governor, members of the legislature, education leaders, schools, and parents and personnel to achieve healthier schools for all children."  Stephen Boese, NYS Director, Healthy Schools Network, added "This is a highly cost-effective and environmentally responsible step that will reduce toxics used by custodians in schools and by agencies. It will help improve indoor air quality and promote healthier building operations."

Arthur Weissman, President and CEO, Green Seal, Washington, DC, a national not for profit environmental labeling and consumer education organization, commented, "We applaud Governor Pataki's initiative. It is critical to create uniform specifications that will ensure high quality and environmentally responsible product purchasing, and drive market changes, such as the efforts underway in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and other states."

 

According to Barrnett, New York State moved to address the greening of schools with funds to replace New York City schools' 300 polluting coal-fired boilers in 1996 with cleaner, energy efficient systems. In 1997, the state enacted comprehensive legislation to improve existing school buildings, including state record keeping systems; in 2000, to reduce pesticide use; in 2002, to seal and remediate or eliminate arsenic-treated wood; and in 2004, to ban highly toxic elemental mercury in schools.  Alarmed by increasing reports of mercury in fish, antibiotics in meat and poultry, hormone-mimicking chemicals in cosmetics, and pesticides in toothpaste, American consumers as a whole are being driven by health and environmental concerns toward the use of green products, from arsenic-free lumber to pesticide-free pet food (See Daily News). Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports magazine and has been testing products since 1936, recently launched a green-products Web site.


 

PESTICIDE-FREE PLAYING FIELDS

 

 

LOCAL ACTION:  We are still seeking to offer a workshop on playing field maintenance led by someone experienced in providing such care without toxic pesticides.  We also hope to compile a booklet with information on such organic athletic field practices and materials.  Because of other work, we have not yet been able to follow up on contacting people responsible for some of these fields in Rhode Island, but are trying to find time to do so.

 

****************************************************************************************

 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA – SOCCER FIELD EXPOSURE UPDATE

 

BACKGROUND:  ChemLawn made promises and did not keep them - sprayed just before kids came on the  field.  Two girls were rushed from the field with anaphylactic reactions, and now have breathing problems when they go near the field.  For a year and a half, nothing was reported about this incident while Corinne Risch, mother of another child sickened by the exposure, tried to get the Atlanta authorities to switch to less toxic playing field care.  When the efforts failed, she went public, and is now working with a task group of parents to bring about change and protect the children from further damage to their health. 

 

 Details from a story in the local paper recently:

 

 

One such exposure was experienced by 15-year-old Kelsey Langworthy last fall.  She came home lightheaded after practice at the city’s Highway 74 Baseball/Soccer Complex with a bright, emerald green substance on her shoes and socks and on her feet.  The healthy and athletic teenager began rapidly manifesting labored breathing, chest pains and other problems that landed her in the emergency room.  Since that time Kelsey has experienced three other occasions of similar symptoms, including one just over a week ago.  On every occasion, the common denominator was her presence at the Hwy. 74 Baseball/Soccer Complex.  For Kelsey’s father, Bill Langworthy, her first-ever episode was something he will never forget.  “The fear was etched in her eyes,” he said.  “As a parent you are there, but there is nothing you can do. You are helpless.”

 

Risch said research on pesticide exposure shows that chronic exposure includes worsening of asthma, headaches, dizziness and flu-like symptoms. Other exposure levels can be much worse.   “Pesticide exposure is very serious and can include asthma attacks which can obviously be fatal, serious allergic reactions like Kelsey experienced and even cancers, which we do see in our soccer population and the children in Peachtree City. The specific cancers associated with pesticide exposure are leukemia, non-Hodgkins lymphoma and brain tumors.”  “I’m a nurse so I believe an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. And if it has happened in the past it will happen again,” Risch continued, recalling her children and others covered in a blue-green substance on one occasion after soccer practice. “The likelihood is a whole lot greater that a lot of other children have been exposed and we want to avoid having one more person experience this.”

 

Risch said the company that applied the pesticide would not release the names of the specific chemicals used to treat the fields. Applications made as recently as last week were claimed by the company to be benign, though parents could not obtain the names of the substances. In the mean time, Risch said, Kelsey had a a fourth reaction while at the soccer fields.   “This is completely unacceptable,” she stressed. “A couple of parents have noticed a pattern where they would bring their kids home from practice and two or three times during the season they’ll be very sick, needing breathing treatments or perhaps needing to go to the  doctor.

******************************************************************************************************************************

 


LESS TOXIC LANDSCAPING

 

LOVE THY NEIGHBOR – OR POISON HER?

A POIGNANT TALE OF WOE FROM FLORIDA

 

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:11:27 –0400

Subject: How Do We Stop Being Exposed to Neighbors’ Landscape Pesticides......


I am so ill again from a neighbor spraying pesticides across the street from me on Wed. of this week.  It has brought on another attract of gastroparesis (stomach nerves freeze and food won't go through your system so what goes down comes back up.  I lost 20 lbs. in 3 weeks the last and 1st time this happened to me   My doctors said it was brought on by my exposure to an organophosphate pesticide that made me very ill.  Of the 9 most common causes 4 of the 9 are associated with pesticides and diabetes is a leading cause but my doctors said my glucose numbers were not high enough to cause this condition and I take no medication for the diabetes.)   I just saw my doctor for the 6-month check-up and he was so pleased that I was on no medication for the gastroparesis and had not had any trouble eating after that attack.   He said it was more proof that my gastroparesis was due to the pesticides.   But here again I had a direct exposure to a pesticide and I have another attack of this disabling condition that could lead to a permanent feeding tube to my stomach.  

 

My doctor had to put a feeding tube in a young woman who was badly poisoned by an organophosphate pesticide several years ago.  Her condition continued to degrade until this was the sad result.  Another Dr. who treats pesticide injured patients told Nancy (a woman who won her poisoning case that he treats) that he had a patient as young as 7 with gastroparesis from pesticide exposures, and has others as well.
 As you know, we leave for 3 days each month so the lawn spraying pesticide industry can come into my neighborhood and we have done this  for years - ever since I got the pesticide / posting / notification law  in Florida that I spearheaded,  the neighbor that sprayed and affected  me last Wed. is well aware of my problem and that we move out for  spraying or treatments but did it anyway with me home.  It was not meant to be mean, it is the lack of understanding of the harm of a little exposure.  How can we protect ourselves from these exposures as there is no way to keep the vapors from entering our home.  We have large carbon filters inside but they don't take the poisons out fast enough to protect me from the vapors or small amount of the poison.  

 

I had a call yesterday from a woman asking the same question of me.   What do we do?  I am tired of being ill from landscape/lawn use pesticides/poisons.  Canada has stopped the problem -- How can we stop it here????   Lawn care should be safe for all.  And it is now not safe for any---health problems abound from these poisons.  Ann Mason, annmason@mindspring.com

 

*****************************************************************************************************************************

 

TAKE ACTION:  SAMPLE WORDING FOR LETTER TO TAKE TO YOUR LOCAL HOME DEPOT

 

Dear Store Manager:

 

I am a regular customer at Home Depot and a supporter of the National Coalition for Pesticide-Free Lawns. I was very pleased to recently learn that Home Depot was asked by Beyond Pesticides and Defenders of Wildlife on behalf of the Coalition to carry a full range of natural, non-toxic lawn and garden products, to train staff to be knowledgeable about non-toxic alternatives, and to reconsider the sale of “weed and feed.” It is currently impossible to shop at Home Depot and purchase the full array of products needed to maintain a natural lawn or garden. I would very much like to see not just one or two natural lawn and garden products on your shelves – but a full range by Spring 2006, and therefore strongly support these requests. In addition to carrying these products, I expect Home Depot staff to be able to offer advice in the use and benefits of natural alternatives. As a do-it-yourselfer, I would also appreciate written materials that provide instructions on how to create and maintain a natural lawn.

 

I would like to shop at Home Depot for my lawn and garden products and will be watching to see if more non-toxic products become available and if efforts are undertaken to train your employees and provide good materials. I urge you to work with the National Coalition for Pesticide-Free Lawns to help make this a reality.

Thank you for listening to my concerns and please convey my support to the company headquarters.

Sincerely,


TIME FOR THE LAST ROUNDUP?

 

NEW STUDIES: MONSANTO'S BEST SELLING "SAFE" PESTICIDE IS HIGHLY TOXIC

Two new peer-reviewed scientific studies have further confirmed the toxicity of glyphosate, the world's most commonly used herbicide. The June 2005 scientific journal "Environmental Health Perspectives" reports that glyphosate, sold by Monsanto under the brand name "Roundup," damages human placental cells at exposure levels ten times less than what the company claims is safe. A study in the August journal Ecological Applications found that even when applied at concentrations that are one-third of the maximum concentrations typically found in waterways, Roundup still killed up to 71 percent of tadpoles in the study. Similar glyphosate studies around the world have been equally alarming. The American Academy of Family Physicians epidemiological research has now linked exposure to the herbicide with increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a life-threatening cancer, while a Canadian study has linked glyphosate exposure with increased risk for miscarriage. A 2002 study linked glyphosate exposure with increased incidence of attention deficit disorder in children. Despite these studies, Monsanto continues to advertise Roundup, sprayed heavily on 140 million acres of genetically engineered crops across the world, as one of the "safest" pesticides on the market

*******************************************************************************************************************

AND WHAT ABOUT THAT ALIEN CORN!

 
EXPLOSIVE MONSANTO DOCUMENTS REVEAL SERIOUS HAZARDS
OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CORN
 
A May 22 headline news story in the London Independent has rocked Monsanto and the biotech industry and fueled the controversy over the safety of genetically engineered food.  The story reveals that internal Monsanto documents, reviewed by EU scientists, show serious health damage to laboratory animals fed Monsanto's new genetically engineered  "rootworm-resistant" corn.  Rats who consumed the mutant corn developed smaller kidneys and exhibited blood abnormalities. Scientists say these are "red flags" for immune system damage and/or cancer tumor promotion. Although the EU will now likely ban Monsanto's new GMO corn, this same  rootworm-resistant corn is already being grown and consumed on a major scale in the United States.  Monsanto has denied that the corn can harm humans, but nonetheless refuses to turn over its data to the media, claiming that the lab studies are  "Confidential Business Information”.
 

TAKE ACTION:  LEARN MORE AND SIGN THE “MILLIONS AGAINST MONSANTO” PETITION  AT http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.html

 

LTL RESOURCES

 

***************************************************************************************************************

Do You Need Some FISHEMO In Your Yard?

5

 

To purchase this organic plant & garden fertilizer, email 8women@gmail.com or stop by the Southside Community Land Trust (SCLT) Office at 109 Somerset Street in Providence.   $3/four oz. bottle or $10/sixteen ounce bottle.  FROM SCLC electronic newsletter, "Southside Outreach" Contact:  Kate Hitmar, <outreach@southsideclt.org>

 

 

******************************************************************************************************************************

 

COMING SOON:  PESTICIDE-FREE LAWNS COALITION DOOR-HANG

 

TIP is a member of this national coalition – see their website at www.pesticide-freelawns.org  This resource, meant to help inform your neighbors about the reasons for avoiding lawn pesticides, should be available by the week of Sept 5.  Contact Liberty Goodwin, TIP Director, for more information.  

 

******************************************************************************************************************************

  

 

 
************************************************************************************
MORE SIGNS OF HOPE?
 
EUROPE DEBATES THE MOST MASSIVE CHEMICAL BAN IN HISTORY

 

From: Grist Magazine <www.grist.org> 5/17/05

 
The European Parliament is set to debate new regulations that would dramatically increase the number of banned chemicals in the EU. The law would require manufacturers of some 30,000 currently legal chemicals to provide scientific evidence that their products are safe for human health and the environment. If the legislation passes, it would have a major impact on thousands of chemicals and products manufactured and sold in the U.S.  Despite much weaker regulations in the U.S. many American companies have no choice but to adhere to European regulations given that  the EU, with 25 countries and 460 million people, represents an even larger market than the U.S. http://www.organicconsumers.org/Politics/strict051805.cfm
 
******************************************************************************************************************************
 
QUICK TIPS

Baking soda makes a good scouring powder.

Cedar shavings and aromatic herbs can replace mothballs.

 

From:  Solid Waste Management, City of Lubbock,  http://solidwaste.ci.lubbock.tx.us/hhw/hhw.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 
TIP TALKS Summer Issue 2005

 

 

MEMBERSHIPS/DONATIONS

 
WELCOME!  Marianne Barker, Wendy Hamilton

 

RENEWALS:   MANY THANKS TO LONG-TIME TIP FRIEND SUSAN WARREN

FOR HER CONTINUED SUPPORT!

 

 

 

TOXICS INFORMATION PROJECT (TIP)

P.O. Box 40572, Providence, RI 02940

Telephone (401) 351-9193

E-Mail:  TIPTALKS@toxicinfo.org

Web:  www.toxicsinfo.org